I must start off by expressing how excited I am to be
covering this topic in class, and to have been learning about such a unique endeavor
in the world of music! This
project is especially appealing to me as a musician and a person who consistently
studies the interaction of language and culture.
I was interested and pleased to see the commentary on Said’s
own musical expertise in the introduction. This has not really been highlighted in any other
information about the orchestra project I have seen thus far. With the two men having such brilliant
minds and such basic passions in life, it is not really surprising that they
would become friends (unless their musician’s personalities would render them
competitive enemies).
Barenboim’s initial lines of his memoriam for Said are
striking. He begins by describing
his friend as the “very essence of human nature because he understood its
contradictions.” This one line
sums up the heart of this article, and the rest of the tribute was written just
as beautifully as the opening paragraph.
The main article itself was interesting in that it was
written in the question-answer format of an interview. Barenboim’s statement about where he
feels at home is what first caught my attention here: he feels the most at home
in the idea of Jerusalem. One of the themes I have taken from
this class is that Jerusalem is, in the minds of those who love it, admired and
adored for what it could be- for its ideal spiritual or aesthetic qualities
that make it the center of the world.
The dialogue became more philosophical than I expected later
on. I managed to learn a bit about
how Barenboim thinks and what is most important to him when it comes to his
work. In all of these writings, I
have found the writers to be very thoughtful and open-minded, yet not withholding
opinion. I believe that everyone
remotely connected to the modern conflict, the world of music, or both would
benefit from reading these careful, honest reflections.
Elizabeth- Barenboim's statement about home also really caught my eye. I think he phrased it in a very intelligent way. He made it clear that the current reality of Jerusalem is not what he considers home, however he expresses a sense of optimism and hope for the future.
ReplyDeleteI agree entirely. The notion that people feel at home in the idea of Jerusalem appears to be a major part of the equation since it seems to be why people feel emotionally attached to the city, which intensifies their claim to the land, at least in their minds. It's also interesting that this notion has popped up throughout the class, and I think that this notion demonstrates why it is hard to come to a solution to the conflict.
ReplyDelete