For a short time during my elementary and middle school
years I attended a very conservative church that occasionally got very
political. My parents decided to
attend because it was very geographically close to home, and a good number of
our close friends from school and work also attended as their “home” church
community. I found out quickly
that the style and focus of this church disagreed with my personality and
particular sensitivities greatly, and it sort of became a catalyst for later
“rebellious” years, which is not at all what the focus of this journal will be.
My intention behind saying this is that during those years
(before my family felt they had had enough and moved to another church
community) I was fed a lot of strongly-held, politically-charged beliefs which
seemed to be universally accepted by the church as scripturally supported, and
not all of which I agreed with.
The topics ranged from the evolution debate, to assumptions about the
LGBT community, to modern-day Israel- a country “called into existence by
God.” I know now that the
existence and legitimacy of this nation is an emotional issue that is much,
much more complex than this church would make it seem.
My childhood vision of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was
molded around the story of Abraham, a man from Canaan who was promised a
son. But seeing as both he and his
wife were about 100 years old (which I always found pretty gross), Abraham gave
up on God’s promise and had one of his servants bear him a son instead
(Ishmael). Well, then God got mad
and Abraham kicked the two of them out and his wife did end of having a son,
after all, named Isaac. The
Sunday-school moral of this story is, “God always keeps his promises.”
This story, and the interpretation that this particular
group held to, had a profound impact on how this church community felt about
the modern-day conflict over Jerusalem and the lands surrounding it. The descendents of Ishmael, I was told,
were a result of Abraham’s mistrust, and thus were condemned to be in constant
conflict with the descendents of his promised son, Isaac. According to their worldview, the
Israeli- Palestinian conflict had no hope of being resolved, because it was a
spiritual battle, and a lesson to us all about trusting God. Either way, they emphasized, it was in
the Christians’ best interest to support the nation of Israel, the home of
God’s Chosen People.
Phew, just typing this stuff out gives me ulcers. I know how emotionally charged the
question of Jerusalem is, how much these ancient names mean to people, and the
extent to which meanings can be misconstrued. Needless to say, the views of this old community I was once
a part of are not my views today, and when I started taking classes in college
and learning about the facts of the modern-day conflict, I felt very resentful
of and a little bit furious with many of the teachings I absorbed as a
child. I hope that in relaying
this history that it will not be offensive to readers, but rather that it will
point out this viewpoint exists and is believed my many Americans today.
No comments:
Post a Comment